A PRACTICAL GUIDE FOR SCHOOLS’26

How Sensory Wayfinding Supports SEND Accessibility, Reduces Staff Load, and Strengthens 2026 Planning

A short, board-ready overview for schools preparing for 2026

Why This Guide Exists

As schools approach the end of the academic year, leadership teams are preparing for December board and SLT meetings — the point where priorities for 2026 are agreed.

For many schools, accessibility and SEND inclusion are high on the agenda.
But knowing what to prioritise, how to evidence impact, and how to fund improvements can feel challenging.

This short guide summarises:

  • what sensory wayfinding is

  • why schools are adopting it now

  • how it reduces staff pressure

  • how it supports a wide range of learners

  • how it fits into Accessibility Plans and Ofsted expectations

The Challenge Schools Are Facing

Across mainstream and specialist settings, schools report similar challenges:

  • High reliance on 1:1 staff support for learner movement

  • Significant staff time lost during transitions between spaces

  • Corridors and shared areas that increase anxiety or dysregulation

  • Narrow circulation spaces that restrict safe movement

  • Accessibility solutions that are costly but low impact

In many SEN settings, staff spend more time guiding movement than supporting learning.

What Is Sensory Wayfinding?

Sensory wayfinding uses tactile and visual cues embedded into the school environment to help learners:

  • understand where they are

  • recognise destinations

  • anticipate transitions

  • move more independently

Rather than relying on constant verbal prompting or physical guidance, learners follow consistent sensory cues through corridors and shared spaces.

This turns the building itself into a form of communication.

Who Does Sensory Wayfinding Support?

One of the key strengths of sensory wayfinding is that it supports multiple learner profiles at once, including:

  • learners with autism

  • learners with sensory processing differences

  • learners with visual impairments

  • learners with developmental or intellectual disabilities

  • learners who experience anxiety during transitions

Because the cues are predictable, non-verbal, and tactile, they reduce cognitive load and support regulation during movement.

What Schools Gain in Practice

Schools using sensory wayfinding report:

  • calmer transitions

  • reduced reliance on 1:1 navigation support

  • increased learner confidence and independence

  • improved orientation and safety

  • fewer bottlenecks in narrow corridors

  • more staff time available for teaching and learning

In other words, the environment begins to do some of the support work itself.

Cost Matters: A Practical Comparison

Traditional accessibility solutions such as wooden rails are often the first option considered — but they are expensive and limited in impact.

Cost per metre (installed):

  • Wooden rails: £1,500 per metre

  • Sensei sensory wayfinding: £36 per metre

A typical 20-metre corridor:

  • Wooden rails: £30,000

  • Sensei: £720

Rails provide physical support only.
Sensory wayfinding supports navigation, regulation, orientation, and independence — while also reducing staff time.

How This Supports Ofsted & Accessibility Planning

Under the updated Education Inspection Framework, inspectors expect to see that:

  • accessibility is planned, not reactive

  • SEND needs are supported across the environment

  • schools can evidence inclusive practice

Sensory wayfinding provides:

  • visible, practical evidence of accessibility

  • clear alignment with Accessibility Plans

  • demonstrable impact on learner experience

  • a coherent, whole-school approach

A Real-World Example: Orchard Hill College & Academy Trust

Orchard Hill College & Academy Trust is currently implementing sensory wayfinding across multiple sites, with two already live.

The Trust selected this approach to:

  • support learners with diverse needs

  • reduce staff pressure during transitions

  • create consistency across sites

  • invest in a solution that scales trust-wide

This model is now informing wider 2026 planning.

Planning for 2026: Why Schools Are Acting Now

Schools choosing to plan accessibility improvements before Christmas benefit from:

  • board-level alignment

  • clearer budget planning

  • access to matched funding support

  • stronger Accessibility Plans

  • readiness for inspections in 2026

Waiting often means delaying progress by another year.

Next Steps

If accessibility, SEND inclusion, or staff workload reduction is part of your 2026 planning:

  • review high-traffic transition spaces

  • identify where staff time is being lost

  • consider solutions that support multiple needs at once

  • ensure changes can be evidenced to boards and inspectors

Next
Next

Wooden Rails vs Sensory Wayfinding: The Real Cost of Accessibility in SEN Schools